Alicia O'Cathain
Alicia O'Cathain
Professor of Health Services Research, University of Sheffield
Verified email at - Homepage
Cited by
Cited by
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
JE Brazier, R Harper, NM Jones, A O'Cathain, KJ Thomas, T Usherwood, ...
British medical journal 305 (6846), 160-164, 1992
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
GF Moore, S Audrey, M Barker, L Bond, C Bonell, W Hardeman, L Moore, ...
bmj 350, 2015
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
QN Hong, S FÓbregues, G Bartlett, F Boardman, M Cargo, P Dagenais, ...
Education for information 34 (4), 285-291, 2018
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
SM Eldridge, CL Chan, MJ Campbell, CM Bond, S Hopewell, L Thabane, ...
bmj 355, 2016
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies
A O’Cathain, E Murphy, J Nicholl
Bmj 341, 2010
The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research
A O'cathain, E Murphy, J Nicholl
Journal of health services research & policy 13 (2), 92-98, 2008
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare
A O'Cathain, L Croot, E Duncan, N Rousseau, K Sworn, KM Turner, ...
BMJ open 9 (8), e029954, 2019
Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews
P Pluye, E Robert, M Cargo, G Bartlett, A O’cathain, F Griffiths, ...
MontrÚal: McGill University 2 (1), 1-8, 2011
" Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires–a bane or a bonus to research?
A O'Cathain, KJ Thomas
BMC medical research methodology 4, 1-7, 2004
Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study
A O'Cathain, E Murphy, J Nicholl
BMC health services research 7, 1-11, 2007
Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study
QN Hong, P Pluye, S FÓbregues, G Bartlett, F Boardman, M Cargo, ...
Journal of clinical epidemiology 111, 49-59. e1, 2019
Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design
C Relton, D Torgerson, A O’Cathain, J Nicholl
Bmj 340, 2010
Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework
A O’Cathain
Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 531, 555, 2010
What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review
A O'Cathain, KJ Thomas, SJ Drabble, A Rudolph, J Hewison
BMJ open 3 (6), e002889, 2013
Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018: user guide
QN Hong, P Pluye, S FÓbregues, G Bartlett, F Boardman, M Cargo, ...
Montreal: McGill University 1, 2018
Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT)
QN Hong, P Pluye, S FÓbregues, G Bartlett, F Boardman, M Cargo, ...
Registration of copyright 1148552, 2018
Integration and publications as indicators of" yield" from mixed methods studies
A O'Cathain, E Murphy, J Nicholl
Journal of mixed methods research 1 (2), 147-163, 2007
Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers
A O’Cathain, P Hoddinott, S Lewin, KJ Thomas, B Young, J Adamson, ...
Pilot and feasibility studies 1, 1-13, 2015
Quality of life of people with mental health problems: a synthesis of qualitative research
J Connell, J Brazier, A O’Cathain, M Lloyd-Jones, S Paisley
Health and quality of life outcomes 10, 1-16, 2012
Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance
G Moore, S Audrey, M Barker, L Bond, C Bonell, C Cooper, W Hardeman, ...
J Epidemiol Community Health 68 (2), 101-102, 2014
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20